Wong v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWallace, Judge
The record shows that defense counsel requested an instruction on the lesser in-*1127eluded offense of unnatural and lascivious act, the trial court understood the request, and the trial court denied the request. For this reason, I conclude that the issue of the trial court’s refusal to give the requested instruction — which the State properly concedes was error — was preserved for appellate review. I .agree with the majority that Wong’s second issue regarding the introduction of collateral crimes evidence is without merit. Accordingly, I concur in part and dissent in part.
I. DISCUSSION
A. Wong was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Amado v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Khianthalat v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.