Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 11, 1969No. 231, September Term, 1968PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury in the Circuit Court for Cecil County of assault upon and battery of Ralph Newton and sentenced to 10 years. 1

At the close of all the evidence, a motion for judgment of acquittal was made and denied and the court instructed the jury. Thereafter the State opened the argument to the jury, defense counsel argued in behalf of the appellant and the State made closing argument. The appellant claims that the closing argument of the State denied him a fair and impartial trial. 2

Of course, the prosecutor may not make statements to the jury which exceed the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Apple v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API