Legal Opinion
Vanscoter v. Sullivan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1990No. Nos. 89-35151, 89-35292PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs represent a class of recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) under Title IV-A of the Social Security Act, on whose behalf the state collects child support payments. Defendant Sullivan is the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (the federal Secretary); defendant Thompson is the Secretary of the Washington Department of Social and Health Services (the state Secretary).
Plaintiffs challenge federal regulations and state practice relating to so-called “pass-through” payments to plaintiffs from child…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Sokha Sun v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert Coleman, District Director of InsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Pedro Pornes-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Evelyn Hill v. Irene Ibarra, in Her Official Capacity the Denver Department of Social Services Mary Krane, in Her Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Barnes v. HealyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.