Legal Opinion

Hall v. Cunningham

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided June 29, 1998No. CV-97-207-BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Hall v. Cunningham CV-97-207-B 06/29/98 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Larry Hall v. Civil No. 97-207-B Michael Cunningham O R D E R Larry Hall has filed a habeas corpus petition raising several federal questions that he listed in his state court notice of appeal but omitted from the brief he filed with the New Hampshire Supreme Court. New Hampshire Supreme Court Rule 16(3) (b) requires an appellant to specify the "questions presented for review" in his brief. Because Hall failed to list any of his federal law issues in his state supreme court brief, he failed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Woodman v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. State v. HaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API