Legal Opinion

State v. Haney, 2007 Ca 71 (8-15-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 2008No. 2007 CA 71Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Brian Haney appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. For the following reasons we will affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

{¶ 2} Haney was convicted of aggravated burglary, disruption of public service, and abduction, and he was sentenced to prison for five years. Haney appealed contesting his sentence and arguing that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made. We affirmed his convictions. State v.Haney, Montgomery App. No. 06CA105, 2007-Ohio-5174. He simultaneously filed a petition for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re J.S., 22063 (8-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Haney, 06ca105 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API