Legal Opinion

Lipeles v. Flood

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1975No. 285, 286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

John and Catherine Flood, the defendants in two real estate mortgage foreclosure actions, contend that they were denied due process at several stages of the trial court proceedings. We conclude that there was no denial of due process and affirm the judgments of foreclosure from which the defendants have appealed.

The actions were commenced against the Floods, then of Long Beach, California, in December, 1966. The plaintiffs in one action were Isaiah Lipeles and his wife Celia and their son Louis Lipeles and his wife Lillian. All were residents of California. Isaiah and Celia Lipeles were the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mid-Plains Telephone, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Lyons v. De ValkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Walford v. BartschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kitchenmaster v. Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Schuck v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Riemer v. RiemerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  3. Rhyner v. Sauk CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API