Legal Opinion

Citizens National Trust and Savings Bank of Los Angeles v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1959No. 16285_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought in the court below by the United States against appellant bank for money paid under mistake and for breach of contract, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345. The appellee sought to recover money paid to the bank as an insurer of a promissory note executed and delivered under the provisions of the National Housing Act, Title I. Ap-pellee alleged that the money had been so paid in error and that appellee was damaged in the amount of money so paid because appellant had failed to comply with the terms of the insurance contract and the regulations of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Glucksman v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1963
  3. Herring v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  4. In Re CarmonaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1963
  5. United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of LexingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API