Giles v. . Halbert
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant, having recovered judgment against the plaintiff for costs in this action, obtained an order at special term requiring Justus Parce to pay such judgment, on the ground that Parce was the person who brought the action and also was beneficially interested in the recovery The order on appeal was affirmed at the general term, and Parce appeals to this court.
I think an appeal lies from the order made at general term. It was a final order, made upon a summary application, after judgment, and is within the express provision of the Code. (§ 11,sub. 3.) The effect of the order was to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yates v. FootCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1814
- Fowler v. Van SurdamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Bliss v. OtisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
3Cited by9 opinions
- Slauson v. . WatkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- First General or Six Principle Baptist Soc. v. LoomisNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Pendleton v. JohnsonThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891
- Voorhees v. . McCartneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Wheeler v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1862
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.