Legal Opinion

In Re Hefron

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2002No. 98S00-0006-DI-390PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Attorney William K. Hefron agreed to represent a client on an hourly basis to recover assets belonging to an estate. Upon learning that substantial assets could be easily recovered, he insisted the client sign a new fee agreement under which the respondent would receive a significant percentage of the value of the recovered assets, as well as a percentage of the value of the estate. For this professional misconduct, we suspend the respondent from the practice of law in Indiana for six months.

Having been admitted to the bar in this state in 1989, the respondent is subject to…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of WiremanIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Matter of GerardIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re ThayerIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re TsoutsourisIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Matter of CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Everett E. Powell, IIIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re LauterIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In the Matter of: Douglas L. KrasnoffIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In Re LauterIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API