Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Parra Perez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 1, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01224Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01224-AWI-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED IN PART 14 MARIA DEL CARMEN PARRA PEREZ, et al., (ECF No. 58) 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Acosta’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default 18 judgment against Defendants Thu Huynh, Ngoc Tran, and THNBT LLC (“Defendants”). The 19 matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.