Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Guzman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided February 10, 1993No. 08-92-00247-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOsborn, Chief Justice

I concur with the majority opinion that the trial court retained jurisdiction under Tex.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. arts. 42.031 and 42.033 to chango the terms of the sentence insofar as it involves a work release program.

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s determination that due process rights do not attach to a change of the sentence and that habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy to determine due process violations in the sentencing process. In Ex parte Walker, 599 S.W.2d 332 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980), the movant sought habeas corpus relief from a misdemeanor charge of theft which resulted in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API