Driscoll v. Green
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Trespass, quare clausum. Facts agreed. The plaintiff and defendant are owners of adjoining lots of land, situated on Chapel street, in Concord. Both parties claim under conveyances from Stephen M. Vail, — the plaintiff, by deed dated May 3, 1864, and the defendant, by deed dated April 22, 1867. The boundary line between the lots is in dispute, and the question of the construction of the plaintiff’s deed is reserved.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The description in the deed from Vail to the plaintiff is as follows: “All that certain lot of land situate in said city of Concord, on the north side of Chapel street, bounded southerly by Chapel street, fifty feet; westerly by land of said Vail and late Samuel Frye, ninety feet; northerly by land of the late Samuel Frye, fifty feet; and easterly by land of said Vail, about ninety-eight feet, with the buildings thereon, — intending to include only the land on which said buildings are situated, and the yard enclosed within the fence as now built.” And the question raised is, whether the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morris v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1849
- Worthington v. HylyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Rutherford v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Pike v. MunroeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
- Herrick v. HopkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1843
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schadlick v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Chao v. the Richey Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad v. Boston & Lowell RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888