Kemper v. Modern Woodmen of America
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sumner district court; Ivan D. Rogers, judge pro tern.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J. :
Iiemmo Ruiter held a benefit certificate in the Modern Woodmen of America, f2000 in amount, payable at death to his wife, Ida Ruiter. On February 13, 1900, the insured filled out and signed a blank form, on the back of his certificate, in which he re*120quested its cancelation and that a new one be issued in the same amount, payable to John Ruiter, a brother. The written request was duly acknowledged before a notary public. The certificate with the request for a change in the beneficiary was mailed at Stillwater, Okla., directed to the head…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Luhrs v. . LuhrsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Titsworth v. TitsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Olmstead v. Masonic Mutual Benefit SocietySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Independent Foresters v. KeliherOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Counsman v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pilcher v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Boice v. ShepardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Hughes v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Stemler v. StemlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Brown v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.