Legal Opinion

Kemper v. Modern Woodmen of America

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1904No. 13,651PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; Ivan D. Rogers, judge pro tern.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

Iiemmo Ruiter held a benefit certificate in the Modern Woodmen of America, f2000 in amount, payable at death to his wife, Ida Ruiter. On February 13, 1900, the insured filled out and signed a blank form, on the back of his certificate, in which he re*120quested its cancelation and that a new one be issued in the same amount, payable to John Ruiter, a brother. The written request was duly acknowledged before a notary public. The certificate with the request for a change in the beneficiary was mailed at Stillwater, Okla., directed to the head…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Luhrs v. . LuhrsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Titsworth v. TitsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Olmstead v. Masonic Mutual Benefit SocietySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Independent Foresters v. KeliherOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Counsman v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pilcher v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Boice v. ShepardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Hughes v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Stemler v. StemlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Brown v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API