Legal Opinion

Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. Clingenpeel

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1997No. CIV-97-1186-APublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALLEY, District Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment filed on August 12,1997, and Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed on September 15, 1997. The parties have responded to each other’s motion. 1

STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). “[A] motion for summary judgment should be granted only when the moving party has established the absence of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. Cagle v. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. v. DoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  3. Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Sollars v. Healthcare RecoveriesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API