Legal Opinion

State v. Sprague

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 4, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

Respondent was indicted for murder and found guilty of manslaughter. Appeal was entered to denial of motion for a new trial, upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant the verdict. Exceptions were also taken to the admission and exclusion of certain testimony.

The appeal will be first considered. The case, as developed by the State, was to the following effect:

Thomas Giggey, thirty-eight years of age, robust and healthy in appearance, powerful of build, was on duty as a policeman in the Town of Fort Fairfield on the evening of August 8, 1936. The respondent, in a restaurant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Phillips v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. State v. LedermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. State v. O'DonnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  5. State v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  2. State v. HumeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  3. State v. WilburSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. State v. BobbSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
  5. State v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API