Legal Opinion

WORZ, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 27, 1958No. 349PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. In view of the representations in the Solicitor General’s brief on pages 4 and 5, concerning testimony given before the Subcommittee on Legislative Oversight of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce subsequent to the decision by the Court of Appeals in this case, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for such action as it may deem appropriate.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Angels Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Fidelity Television, Inc., Rko General, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. TV 9, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  5. Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API