Legal Opinion
Christmann v. Christmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 28, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange Comity (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated November 24, 1999, as failed to (1) apportion the amount owed on his First U.S.A. Bank credit card as marital debt, (2) direct the plaintiff to sign the necessary forms to permit him to name two of the parties’ children as his dependents for income tax purposes, and (3) treat the *528parties’ son Steven as emancipated as of February 8, 1999, in calculating his child support obligation. By decision and order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bogin v. GoodrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Feldman v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Fortunato v. FortunatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Toffler v. TofflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Christmann v. ChristmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wexler v. WexlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ropiecki v. RopieckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cabeche v. CabecheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Agnello v. PayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006