Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Equipment Finance v. Nabil Asterbadi
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 4, 2016No. 15-2182PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge ■ NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge DIAZ and Judge KEELEY joined.
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we address the enforceability of a judgment originally entered in the Eastern District of Virginia but registered for enforcement in the District of Maryland under 28 U.S.C. § 1963. Particularly, we consider the time period during which the judgment remains enforceable in Maryland.
Collecting on a financing debt incurred by Dr. Nabil J. Asterbadi, CIT/Equipment Financing, Inc. (“CIT”) obtained a $2.63 million judgment against Asterbadi in 1993,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Stiller v. HardmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Estate of Marcos Human Rights Litigation v. Estate of MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Home Port Rentals, Inc. v. International Yachting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
3Cited by9 opinions
- Won Sun Lee v. Won Bok LeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Stevenson v. Edgefield HoldingsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Brothers of the Wheel M.C. Executive Council, Inc. v. MollohanDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
- Dealer Services Corporation v. AlbertsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
- Lee v. LeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.