Legal Opinion

Stainer v. Latimer (In re Latimer)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1990No. 89-5116PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

*137Defendants appeal from an order of the district court affirming the bankruptcy court’s order avoiding all conveyances of real property by debtor Caesar C. Latimer and his wife Emily L. Latimer. We affirm.

The trustee, Kenneth L. Stainer, commenced an adversary action in the bankruptcy court to recover the real property the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glannon v. Carpenter (In Re Glannon)District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  2. Hughes-Bechtol, Inc. v. State (In Re Hughes-Bechtol, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  3. Holcomb Health Care Services, LLC v. Quart Limited, LLC (In Re Holcomb Health Care Services, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
  4. Reding v. Gallagher (In Re Childs)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  5. Blue Mountain Investments, Ltd. v. Bone (In Re Blue Mountain Investments, Ltd.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API