Legal Opinion

Miller v. Clary

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by Josiah T. Miller against Thomas J. Clary and others to enforce covenants for certain deeds and for damages. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.

In June, 1867, the Phoenix Mills of Seneca Falls, a corporation, took title to several parcels of real estate located in the village of Seneca Falls, together with certain valuable water rights, and among the properties acquired by said corporation were four parcels of land described in the complaint, and which in 1872 were conveyed by, the Phoenix Mills of Seneca Falls; one parcel being conveyed to Michael I. C. Zalinski, another parcel being conveyed to Isaac Desky, another to Chauncy B. Howe, and still another parcel being conveyed to William Johnson, and in this litigation these several…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of New York v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Welsh v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Carthage Tissue Paper Mills v. Village of CarthageNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Snell v. . LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Conabeer v. . N.Y. Central H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re: Prudential Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  3. Dicola v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Miller v. ClaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API