Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Harry L. Hussman Refrigerator & Supply Co. v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 17, 1928Published

1Dissent

GRAVES, J.,

(dissenting.). — We prepared a dissent in this case, but a change in the original opinion has rendered a part of what we urged, in great detail, unnecessary. Then we have since also an amended separate concurring opinion, which can now be noticed. We are therefore withdrawing our original dissent and filing in lieu thereof this opinion.

There are two eases pending here. The instant case, and the case of State ex rel. Rosebrough Monument Co., Relator, v. City of St. Louis et al., being our No. 28364. In both cases the amendments to the St. Louis Charter of April 5, 1927, are…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Kansas City v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  4. Doyle v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Garner v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API