Legal Opinion
St. Bernard Port v. Violet Dock Port, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 2018No. 2016-CA-0096; NO. 2016-CA-0262; NO. 2016-CA-0331PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LOBRANO, J., DISSENTS WITH REASONS TO FOLLOW
JENKINS, J., DISSENTS
I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part from the majority opinion.
I agree with the majority's ruling against St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District ("St. Bernard Port")1 and in favor of Violet Dock Port Inc., LLC ("Violet Port"),2 finding that the $16 million deposited into the registry of the court on December 22, 2010, the date of the expropriation under Louisiana's "quick-taking" statutes, La. R.S. 19:141, et seq.3 was a deficient amount to compensate Violet Port to the "full extent of loss" as required by La.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gonzales v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Evans v. LungrinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- McLean v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Mundy v. OrnsbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Giovanni MucciacciaroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022