Legal Opinion

Foster 643153 v. Burgess

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 28, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00781Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ DALLAS FOSTER, Petitioner, Case No. 1:23-cv-781 v. Honorable Sally J. Berens MICHAEL BURGESS, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Petitioner consented to proceed in all matters in this action under the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge. (Pet., ECF No. 1, PageID.13.) Section 636(c) provides that “[u]pon the consent of…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API