Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Huffman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1947No. 17,603PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, P. J.

The appellee was granted a divorce from the appellant by the Dearborn Circuit Court but, for reasons which we can only surmise, he has not favored us with a brief in support of the judgment he obtained below.

As late as June 19, 1947, the Supreme Court in Meadows v . Hickman (1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N. E. (2d) 343, re-affirmed the rule announced in Miller v. Julian (1904), 163 Ind. 582, 72 N. E. 588, which we quote as follows: “the neglect of an appellee to file a brief controverting the errors complained of by an appellant may be taken or deemed to be a confession of such errors, and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meadows v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bryant v. School Town of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Reed, Admr. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Miller v. JulianIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. LinderIndiana Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newton D/B/a, Etc. v. Hunt D/B/a, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Fagan v. ROYERIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lunsford v. MaidaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Associates Investment Co. v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Whallon v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API