Huffman v. Huffman
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, P. J.
The appellee was granted a divorce from the appellant by the Dearborn Circuit Court but, for reasons which we can only surmise, he has not favored us with a brief in support of the judgment he obtained below.
As late as June 19, 1947, the Supreme Court in Meadows v . Hickman (1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N. E. (2d) 343, re-affirmed the rule announced in Miller v. Julian (1904), 163 Ind. 582, 72 N. E. 588, which we quote as follows: “the neglect of an appellee to file a brief controverting the errors complained of by an appellant may be taken or deemed to be a confession of such errors, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meadows v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Bryant v. School Town of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Reed, Admr. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Miller v. JulianIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. LinderIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newton D/B/a, Etc. v. Hunt D/B/a, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1957
- Fagan v. ROYERIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Lunsford v. MaidaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
- Associates Investment Co. v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Whallon v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.