Legal Opinion

Matter of Rogers

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided December 29, 1994No. 12-93-00064-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMEY, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a bench trial judgment in favor of a will contestant in which the trial court ruled that a 1959 document was not a valid testamentary instrument, thus necessitating the administration of an estate under the laws of intestate succession. Dollie R. Shelton, decedent’s sister, had offered Annie B. Rogers’s purported 1959 holographic will as a muniment of title; it was admitted to probate on March 2, 1992. Subsequently, decedent’s nephew, Raymond Rogers, filed an action contending that Annie B. Rogers had died intestate and seeking a declaration that a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hinson v. HinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. May v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Baptist Foundation of Texas v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Chambers v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cason v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  2. Matter of Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994
  3. in the Estate of Billy Joe Wlecyk A/K/A Billy Joe Wleczyk, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API