Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. A. W. Stickle & Co.
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1941No. 368PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, District Judge.
The question now presented for determination in this cause is whether or not the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, Chapter 8, 49 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., particularly Section 322(b) thereof when read in connection with 321(c), operates as an exception to Section 51 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 112.
The defendant, A. W. Stickle & Company, a corporation, is a domestic corporation and has its principal office and place of business in Oklahoma City in the Western District of Oklahoma. The complaint filed herein so alleges. It is charged in the complaint that the defendant has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. A. W. Stickle & Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1941