Hall v. Jestes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentSimms, Justice
¶ 1 I must respectfully dissent. I do not concur with the majority’s view that the facts of this case support the trial court’s decision to apply the doctrine of incorporation by reference and its finding that the attached Exhibit A should be incorporated by reference into Sneed’s will. Further, I am persuaded that contestant has been denied an opportunity to challenge the legitimacy of Exhibit A and present evidence on issues concerning decedent’s competency and proponent’s undue influence over decedent in procuring the document.
¶ 2 As noted by the majority, certain requirements and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Brooker v. BrookerTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.