Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Gilliland
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge McCandless—
Affirming.
Eas F.. Gilliland recovered a judgment against the Louisville & Nashville Eailroad 'Company for $3,675.00 for personal injuries which it is alleged he received as a result of inhaling fumes from certain disinfectants while engaged in oleaning'passenger coaches at Earlington, Ky. Defendant appeals. The principal contention is that the court erred in failing to give a directed verdict, a motion for -which, was made at the close of appellant’s evidence and again at the close of all the evidence,
Appellee did various kinds of work for appellant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wilson v. Chess & Wymond Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Jellico Coal Co. v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Gosney v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Co. v. TackittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Evinger v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Watkins v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Symons v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Coburn v. North American Refractories Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Paducah Battery Co. v. EdgarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.