United States v. Wilbur
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRawlinson, Circuit Judge
I agree that there was no violation of the defendants’ due process rights when the *1183government indicted and prosecuted the defendants for violations of the Contraband Cigarette Trafficking Act (CCTA). See United States v. Baker, 63 F.3d 1478, 1492 (9th Cir.1995).
I also agree that neither the Treaty at Point Elliott nor any Washington law deprives the State of Washington of its inherent power to enforce its cigarette tax laws against the defendants. See id. at 1485 (interpreting a similar treaty provision and concluding that the CCTA did not impermissibly restrict tribal trading); see also…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Robert ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jimenez RecioSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Reuben KrasnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.