Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Alan Kaylor, United States of America v. Mark Alan Kaylor

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1989No. 88-5393, 88-5394PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.

Mark Alan Kaylor appeals his convictions after a jury trial on two counts of taking from a registered pharmacy by force or intimidation controlled substances which had a replacement cost to the registrant of not less than $500. 18 U.S.C. § 2118(a) (Supp. V 1987). Kaylor argues the following grounds for reversal: (1) that 18 U.S.C. § 2118(a) must fall as unconstitutionally vague; (2) failure to submit jury instructions defining the statutory terms “replacement cost” and “material or compound;” (3) insufficiency of the evidence to establish that the replacement cost…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. Vernon Snype, Marisa HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Ike WeemsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. J.T. HaunCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Aaron AgnewCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless TelephoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API