Mata v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice BAIRD.
Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of murder. The indiet ment also alleged a prior felony conviction for the purpose of enhancing the range of punishment. A jury convicted appellant of the charged offense. Following appellant’s plea of not true, the jury found the enhancement allegation true and assessed punishment at ninety-nine years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division, and a fine of $10,000. We affirm the conviction, but reverse and remand for a new trial on punishment. 2
I. Self Defense and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Alejandro Rodriguez Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Alejandro Rodriguez Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Christopher Wiley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
- Chukwuemeka Mbata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.