Legal Opinion

In Re Daisy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2005No. 132A05PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF CENSURE

In a letter dated 14 July 2004, the Judicial Standards Commission (Commission) notified Judge William L. Daisy (respondent) that it had ordered a preliminary investigation to determine whether formal proceedings under Commission Rule 9 should be instituted against him. The investigation involved allegations that respondent had sexually harassed a judicial assistant.

On 24 November 2004, Special Counsel for the Commission filed a complaint alleging in pertinent part:

3. The respondent engaged in [the] following inappropriate conduct:

a. The respondent hugged, touched and engaged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Nos. 09-013, 09-018 & 09-029 BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. In Re Inquiry Concerning BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  4. In Re BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. EARLS v. NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API