Legal Opinion

Hellams v. Harnist

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 14, 1985No. 0366PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

Nancy J. C. Hellams (Mrs. Hellams) brought this action against Paul L. Harnist (Mr. Harnist) and Lillian May Har-nist (Mrs. Harnist) for the reformation of a deed of Mrs. Hellams to Mr. and Mrs. Harnist. The appealed order reformed the deed on the grounds that there had been a mutual mistake in the drafting of the description of the deed. We disagree and reverse.

On June 27, 1980, Mrs. Hellams executed and delivered to Mr. and Mrs. Harnist a deed, in which the conveyed property was described as follows:

All that lot, piece or parcel of land lying, being and situate in the County…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McPherson v. J. E. Sirrine & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  2. Sims v. TylerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Smith v. Du RantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McNair v. RainsfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Flair Broadcasting Corp. v. PowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Crewe v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. McNair v. RainsfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API