Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 14, 2003No. 02-2095PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Jesus Mendoza Maldonado, a Texas resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985, and state law. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Maldonado is a former student at Thomas M. Cooley Law School (“the law school”). He initiated this action in February of 1999,- in the Southern District of Texas. On July 12, 1999, Maldonado filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Ruby H. Harris v. Reginald Callwood & Daisy CallwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Grover v. Eli Lilly And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Warfield v. AlliedSignal TBS Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Andrea Jaye Mosby v. Reaves Law Firm, PLLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
  2. Forte v. Peter Cremer North America, LPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  3. Garner v. Fuyao Glass America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. In re: Thomas R. Berkley v. Lauren ParnofielloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  5. Knight v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API