Legal Opinion

United States v. Wells

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2001No. 00-10134, 00-10266PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:

This direct criminal appeal involves three appellants who were each convicted of one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and one count of distribution of cocaine base. The appellants raise various arguments, including challenges to evi-dentiary rulings, jury instructions, and sentencing error. Because we find the erroneous admission of hearsay testimony against Loletta Scott was not harmless, we VACATE her convictions and REMAND for further proceedings. With respect to Rodney Wells, we find the submission of a deliberate ignorance instruction was harmless…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Martin Gonzalez MunozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Samuel Duncan, Jr., Grace Duncan, Gay Nell Duncan, Marshall Sutton, Angela F. Turner, Arthur D. Wilson, and Oscar L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. La Day v. Catalyst Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. United States v. Juan Arturo Mendoza-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. NewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API