Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Ashton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 18, 1951No. 16638PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

Disposition of this matter is now made on the response to our rule to show cause why respondents should not be restrained from proceeding further in an action pending in the county court of the City and County of Denver, wherein the Honorable Howard O. Ashton as judge of said court and respondent herein, granted a new trial of petitioner on the court’s own motion “based upon the verdict on the grounds of misconduct of the jury.”

Four days after a verdict of not guilty on the charge of violation of city ordinances was returned by the jury and received by the court and judgment entered thereon,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Boyles v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Heller v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Waite v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Waite v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation v. Tillie Mely, as Administratrix of the Estate of A. E. Mely, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. State v. HardingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Hall v. LevineSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. People v. RodriquezColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API