Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1903No. 2753PublishedCited by 7 opinions

• The appellant, Robert Smith, ivas charged by indictment, under article 877, Penal Code, with the theft of a certain horse intrusted to him as bailee, he having sold the same and converted the proceeds of said sale to his own use. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOH", Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged, under article 877, Penal Code, with theft, in that he converted a certain horse intrusted to him as bailee. He received the horse in Victoria County, rode it into De Witt County, and there disposed of it. His defensive theory was that he had permission of the owner to dispose of the horse. Exception was reserved to the charge because it failed to instruct the jury that the fraudulent intent in converting the property was necessary to the conviction. An inspection of the charge sustains this contention. After charging the jury with reference to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dupree v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Regittano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Goforth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Downs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API