Legal Opinion
Edwin Omar Flores Tejada v. Elizabeth Godfrey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 2020No. 18-35460PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWIN OMAR FLORES No. 18-35460 TEJADA; GERMAN VENTURA HERNANDEZ, on behalf of D.C. No. themselves as individuals and 2:16-cv-01454-JLR on behalf of others similarly situated *, Petitioners-Appellees, OPINION v. ELIZABETH GODFREY, Field Office Director; WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; LOWELL CLARK, Warden; JAMES MCHENRY, Director of Executive Office for Immigration Review; * Because the district court dismissed Arturo Martinez Baños as a named…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Vijendra K. Singh v HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Garland v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Favela Avendano v. BostockDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Flores Tejada v. GodfreyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Garland v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.