Legal Opinion

Tillman v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 11, 2003No. 00-10963PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Per curiam

On June 13, 2001, we issued an opinion in this case in which, inter alia, we asked the Alabama Supreme Court to answer a certified question regarding the interpretation of Alabama law concerning the liability of retailers who sell cigarettes. See Tillman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, 253 F.3d 1302, 1307-08 (11th Cir.2001). Federal jurisdiction of this case turns on the answer to our certified question because, as we stated, “If the complaint states a cause of action against retailers, there is no federal jurisdiction based on diversity.” Id. at 1307. The question is as follows:

WHETHER THERE IS…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Tillman v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Grancare v. Ruth ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Jocelyn Allen v. the Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Onelum v. Best Buy Stores L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  5. Salkin v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API