State v. Anonymous
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
The defendants have moved to dismiss the informations in these eases charging each of them with the crime of disorderly conduct in violation of § 53a-182 of the penal code. Those motions, pursuant to § 499A of the Practice Book, seek dismissal on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to justify bringing the defendants to trial. The state has stipulated to the facts which constituted its position that the crime of disorderly conduct was committed in each case. Hence, the question presented for decision is whether as a matter of law probable cause exists to support the state’s claim…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ashton v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. CarcelNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- State v. AvnayimConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zalaski v. City of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Zalaski v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Zalaski v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Layton City v. TattonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- State v. MuckleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.