Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Shafer & Miller, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The trial court, having determined that Shafer & Miller, Inc. had tendered an offer of settlement to Westinghouse Electric Corporation in an amount greater than the verdict subsequently returned by a jury, correctly held that Westinghouse was not entitled to attorney’s fees as a prevailing party under section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1985). See Greenough v. Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co., 449 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); cf. C.U. Assocs., Inc. v. R.B. Grove, Inc., 472 So.2d 1177 (Fla.1985) (construing section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1981)). As the remaining points presented do not merit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- CU Associates, Inc. v. RB Grove, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Greenough v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Danis Ind. v. Ground Imp. TechniquesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Baker Protective Services v. FP INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Willey v. MK Roark, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Perez-Ramirez v. Dexter DevelopmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003