Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Shafer & Miller, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 25, 1987No. 86-2193PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court, having determined that Shafer & Miller, Inc. had tendered an offer of settlement to Westinghouse Electric Corporation in an amount greater than the verdict subsequently returned by a jury, correctly held that Westinghouse was not entitled to attorney’s fees as a prevailing party under section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1985). See Greenough v. Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co., 449 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); cf. C.U. Assocs., Inc. v. R.B. Grove, Inc., 472 So.2d 1177 (Fla.1985) (construing section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1981)). As the remaining points presented do not merit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. CU Associates, Inc. v. RB Grove, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Greenough v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Danis Ind. v. Ground Imp. TechniquesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Baker Protective Services v. FP INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Willey v. MK Roark, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Perez-Ramirez v. Dexter DevelopmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API