Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 6, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKiNdig, J.

After being duly indicted, the defendant appellant was tried to a jury, under a plea of “not guilty ” ancj convicted, upon sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict In fact, he admitted having possession of at least some of the stolen merchandise, but claimed that he did not know from where it came, explaining that the personal property was delivered into his custody by one Henry Thomas, who, it was asserted, “broke” into and “entered” the store and feloniously took the goods therefrom.

I. Objection is made to the introduction of evidence and certain charges submitted by the court to the jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. State v. HardingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. State v. VandewaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. State v. FortuneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. State v. BarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. State v. GrimmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. State v. BrodieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API