Legal Opinion

Miller v. Reed

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 1962No. 5-2677PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This is an original proceeding in which Petitioners, Sturgis Miller, et al., seek a Writ of Prohibition to prevent the Honorable Murray O. Reed, Chancellor, from proceeding further in a case pending in the Chancery Court. The Petitioners herein list themselves as “Sturgis Miller, President, Ed S. Doss, Vice President, and R. Gr. McBryde, Secretary-Treasurer, of Arkansas Chiropractic Association; H. Gr. Perkins, Foy Weeks, H. L. Hudsonpillar, A. M. Reynolds, P. D. Bosma, and Gordon Lynch, members of the Board of Directors of Arkansas Chiropractic Association;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bassett v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Terry v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Missionary Supporters, Inc. v. Ark. State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Arkansas State Medical Board v. SchoenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Kuhl v. Ark. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API