Legal Opinion

Small v. Usher

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 1907No. 6538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by Emma A. Small, administratrix of S. E. Usher, J. H. and E. J. Usher. From Circuit orders., defendants appeal. cite: Appeal lies from the first order after Ming of second: 17 S. C., 150. Distributee should not be charged with rents on his share of lands: 38 S. C., 469; 33 S. C., 255. No citation.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an action for an accounting and settlement of the estate of S. E. Usher, who departed this life on the 27th of August, 1902, leaving as his heirs at law his widow, the defendant E. J. Usher, and his children, two of whom are the defendant, J. H. Usher, and the plaintiff, Emma A. Small.

The following claims were established against the estate: Judgment for costs in the case of Am-. E. L. Mortgage Co., $254.85; W. P. Davis Mortgage, $519.00; plaintiff’s attorney’s fee, $400.00; order for judgment in the case of McManus v. S. B.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. KearneyNew York Court of Chancery · 1848

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Stanley v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Rookard v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  4. Wilson v. GordonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  5. Tedder v. TedderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API