Legal Opinion

New Jersey National Bank & Trust Co. v. Morris

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 12, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bigelow, V. C.

This is a foreclosure suit. The complainants move for the appointment of a receiver to collect rents pendente lite. They do not allege that their security is inadequate or that their obligor is insolvent, but they rely exclusively upon a *445danse in the mortgage whereby the rents and profits oí the mortgaged premises were assigned to the mortgagee in the event of default in the performance of any of the covenants contained in the bond. There has been default in the performance of some of the covenants and by reason thereof complainants claim that the assignment has become absolute.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arcade Realty Holding Corp. v. HildingerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Midlantic National Bank v. SourlisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. PasternackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  3. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re Princeton Overlook Joint VentureUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  5. Life Ins. Co. v. HOCROFTNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API