Legal Opinion
STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Lundy
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided July 18, 2008No. A-9493, A-9494, A-9836PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Chief Judge.
The three defendants-Richard E. Lundy Jr., Richard J. Callahan, and Donald J. Chase-were each convicted of offenses related to the sexual abuse of a minor and sentenced to prison. As part of the sentencing order in each case, and over the objections of the State, the superior court ordered the Department of Corrections to "provide meaningful sex offender treatment" to each defendant while he is incarcerated.
The State objected to this provision of the sentencing orders because the Department of Corrections has decided to stop offering sex offender treatment to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rust v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Abraham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- LaBarbera v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Rust v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donald McDonald v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Alaska Parole Board, and Nancy DahlstromAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Cynthia Lord v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021