Moore v. State

BEATTY, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to determine whether, in this no-opinion case, the Court of Criminal Appeals erred when it failed to address certain issues raised by the petitioner below and preserved for review here by virtue of a Rule 39(k), A.R.App.P., statement. 519 So.2d 1386.

The petitioner maintains that the trial court erred when it refused to allow his counsel to examine certain notes prior to cross-examination, when the witness had referred to those notes during his examination-in-chief. On that point, the record reflects the following after the State’s direct examination was…