Legal Opinion

State v. Crouch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1910No. 8887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered October 16, 1909, upon a trial and conviction of rape.

1Per curiam

The appellant was convicted of the crime of rape upon a female under the age of eighteen years.- At the trial, counsel for the appellant requested the court to. instruct the jury to the effect that no conviction could be had upon the uncorroborated testimony of the female alleged to-have been raped. The trial court refused to so instruct the jury. This was error. The statute provides at § 2443, Rem. & Bal. Code: “No conviction shall be had . . . upon the testimony of the female upon or against whom the crime was committed, unless supported by other-evidence.” This, means, of course, that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State Of Washington v. Paul Tlusty, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API