Legal Opinion
Gammill v. U.S. Department of Education
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0409PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Paul Gammill, proceeding pro se, brings this action against defendant the United States Department of Education (“DOE”) under the Whistleblower Protection Act (“WPA”), 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8). Gammill alleges that he was fired in retaliation for “whistleblowing” activities protected under federal law. Before the Court is [14] DOE’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Federal Civil Rule 12(b)(1), [16] [23] [29] Gammill’s three “motions for order to rule in favor of the plaintiff,” [31] DOE’s motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Coalition for Underground Expansion v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Stella, Marie v. v. Mineta, Norman Y.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tyson v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Tjgem LLC v. Republic of GhanaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Desert Sunlight 250, LLC v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Jindal v. Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Robb v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.