Crow v. Van Sickle
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Douglas County. This was an action on a note for $9,650, and interest at the rate of two per cent, per month, made by defendant Yan Sickle to Mary Crow, October 26th, 1868, and a mortgage of even date to secure. the same on the “ Kinney Ranch,” the “ Bob Lyons Ranch ” and “Van Sicklels Hotel” in Douglas County. ■ Wells, Fargo & Co., H. F. Dangberg and J. J. Jones were made parties defendant, as having some…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Douglas County. This was an action on a note for $9,650, and interest at the rate of two per cent, per month, made by defendant Yan Sickle to Mary Crow, October 26th, 1868, and a mortgage of even date to secure. the same on the “ Kinney Ranch,” the “ Bob Lyons Ranch ” and “Van Sicklels Hotel” in Douglas County. ■ Wells, Fargo & Co., H. F. Dangberg and J. J. Jones were made parties defendant, as having some interest in the property mortgaged subsequent to the lien of the mortgage. I. The note.and mortgage being made to the wife of…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Lewis, C. J.:
Suit to foreclose a mortgage, the complaint alleging that the note to secure which the mortgage was given was executed to Mary Crow, who it is charged was at the time of its execution and delivery, and ever since has been, the wife of plaintiff, and that, the consideration upon which the note and mortgage were executed was money received by the defendant Van Sickle from the plaintiff. It is also alleged that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the note and mortgage, and that they now are and “ have ever been the common property of himself and his Said wife.”
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mott v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. EdwardsNevada Supreme Court · 1926
- Reade v. de LeaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1908